PortalsGate

By Isaiah-Phillips Akintola

Jehu was specifically chosen through Elisha’s ministry for a singular mission: to dismantle the house of Ahab and eradicate the corrupting influence of Queen Jezebel. This was not a broad mandate to guide Israel towards prosperity; it was a precise operation targeting powerful evil that had deeply infiltrated the nation’s leadership and its people. The accounts in 2 Kings 9-10 unveil essential insights regarding prophetic function that resonate profoundly with our contemporary spiritual and political landscape that we should not only pay attention to but seek keen insight into its flaws, limitations, and mistakes.

Jehu’s military campaign proved to be remarkably effective. He methodically dismantled and destroyed Ahab’s household, arranged for Jezebel’s dramatic downfall, and obliterated Baal worship across Israel. His fervor for this destructive mission was so profound that it became legendary “the driving of Jehu” became a term synonymous with relentless and forceful action aimed at eradicating evil.

The scripture notes that Jehu “destroyed Baal from Israel” and that “the Lord said to Jehu, ‘Because you have done well in accomplishing what is right in My eyes, and have done to the house of Ahab all I had in mind to do, your descendants will sit on the throne of Israel to the fourth generation’” (2 Kings 10:28, 30). This divine approval confirms that Jehu acted in perfect alignment with his anointing. His mandate for destruction was not only justified but also celebrated by heaven until other aspects of Jehu’s character began to emerge.

Seeing beyond the Obvious

However, beneath this remarkable testimony, there are substantial underlying errors and questionable values that need to be acknowledged, especially in the context of what may be seen as another season of Jehu’s anointing in action. One crucial element we must not ignore during this pivotal moment is spiritual blindness— the inability to understand and accurately articulate what we observe globally concerning the overextension and misrepresentation of leadership authority from both spiritual and political perspectives.

Isaiah 42:18 Listen, you deaf ones; look, you blind ones, that you may see! 19 Who is blind but My servant, or deaf like the messenger I am sending? Who is blind like My covenant partner, or blind like the servant of the LORD? 20 Though seeing many things, you do not keep watch. Though your ears are open, you do not hear.” …

The deficiency of spiritual insight regarding accurate biblical interpretation, especially from the standpoint of spiritual or political leadership representation, is a matter that requires our attention. Why is this important? As the scriptures caution, when there is no clarity of vision, the people will perish. The term “perishing” signifies a casting off of restraint, reflecting a complete absence of discipline, sound judgment, and wisdom to think and act appropriately.

The increasing instances of misinterpretation or misjudgement regarding God’s intentions, especially during this period of leadership transition, prompts me to encourage an exploration of the different dimensions and limitations associated with what is commonly referred to as the prophetic anointing. This discussion particularly relates to what many identify as the Jehu’s leadership anointing manifesting on the global political stage.

Before we delve into the specifics of Jehu’s type of anointing, let’s take a moment to explore the concept of prophetic dimension, grace, or anointing, as well as its limitations and boundaries. Within the body of Christ, there is a common belief that being called anointed by God grants an individual unlimited access to grace. However, this notion is unfortunately misleading.

When God calls us to undertake a specific assignment, that task comes with a unique level of grace, knowledge, wisdom, and capacity that operates solely within the parameters of that mandate. No matter the scale or intricacy of the calling, you are confined to the anointing of grace that has been bestowed upon you. Attempting to exceed the limits of your assigned mandate can result in a complete rejection from God, as illustrated in Scripture.

The Hebrew term “mashach,” which translates to anoint, embodies more than just a ceremonial gesture. It signifies God’s bestowal of particular authority and ability for specific purposes. However, this divine empowerment also includes an often-ignored element: intentional limitation from the Lord.

Prophetic anointing fulfills two essential roles that align seamlessly with God’s design.
Enhancement of Abilities: It amplifies natural talents and bestows supernatural capacities, empowering individuals to achieve feats that exceed human limitations.
Establishment of Boundaries: Equally significant, it creates divine limits that delineate function and responsibility within designated spheres of authority.

The two prophetic anointings, which signify enhancement and the establishment of boundaries, are vividly illustrated in the lives of King Saul and King David. These influential leaders of Israel demonstrate that even within the realm of anointing, there are specific levels and limitations imposed upon us.

The differences in their heart postures toward God clearly define their limitations. The right character values significantly impact the extent to which one’s anointing can operate. Both King Saul and King David were called and chosen by God to lead; however, their approaches differed greatly. David possessed a profound understanding of the deeper intent behind his relationship with God, while Saul was primarily focused on the power and authority of leadership, neglecting the devotion and worship owed to the God who appointed him.

Saul, despite being a king, struggled to distinguish the sacred from the profane. His disdain and irreverence toward the things of God stemmed from a lack of discernment and understanding of God’s intentions, ultimately leading to the rejection of his leadership. In contrast, we observe David, who, although there was no formal decree declaring him a priest, entered the temple of God and ate the showbread, which was meant solely for priests.

Remarkably, he even shared the bread with his hungry soldiers and faced no judgment for this act. This illustrates the condition and character of David’s heart, which is crucial to understand. Otherwise, one might not grasp why God appeared to favor David despite his breach of priestly protocol, while King Saul was judged for a seemingly similar situation.

Levels and Limitation of Prophetic Function

Scripture reveals various dimensions of prophetic ministry, each with distinct characteristics and limitations. The occasional prophetic expression seen in Numbers 11:25-29 differs vastly from the office of prophet described in Ephesians 4:11. Similarly, the prophetic presbytery mentioned in 1 Timothy 4:14 operates differently from the transferred mantle witnessed in Elijah and Elisha’s relationship.

Understanding these levels prevents us from imposing unrealistic expectations on prophetic ministers or misinterpreting their specific assignments. A prophet called to expose corruption may not possess the anointing to rebuild what they’ve torn down. A visionary prophet may lack the administrative skills needed to implement their revelations.

Moses provides an excellent example of comprehensive prophetic anointing with clear limitations. While he possessed extraordinary authority to lead Israel out of Egypt and receive the Law, he was specifically restricted from entering the Promised Land. His anointing was complete for his assignment but limited to his generation and calling.

This limitation wasn’t punishment it was divine design. Joshua’s anointing was specifically crafted for the conquest and settlement phase that Moses couldn’t lead. Each anointing served its purpose within God’s larger redemptive timeline.

Every prophetic anointing, whether dismantling of the high places or constructive, serves God’s eternal redemptive purposes. As Isaiah 46:10 declares: “Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times things that are not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure.’”

In our current spiritual climate, discernment regarding prophetic dimensions is crucial. We’re witnessing various expressions of prophetic ministry, each serving specific functions within God’s broader purposes. Some are called to expose, others to encourage, and still others to establish.

The key to navigating this season lies in recognizing what God is accomplishing through each vessel without demanding that they function beyond their grace. This requires maturity from both prophetic ministers and the broader church community. The ecclesia must embrace the humility to operate within their assigned boundaries, while the church must develop the wisdom to discern and appreciate different prophetic functions without criticism or unrealistic expectations.

God’s design for limited anointing ultimately serves His larger purpose of body ministry. As Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 12, no single member can claim to need no other members. This interdependence is by design, not accident.

When prophetic ministers understand their limitations, they naturally seek collaboration with complementary anointings. This creates the healthy spiritual ecosystem God intends, where various graces work together to accomplish His complete purposes.

The alternative attempting to function beyond one’s anointing leads to spiritual exhaustion, diminished effectiveness, and often, significant harm to God’s purposes and people. Understanding prophetic dimensions isn’t merely about appreciating current ministries it’s about preparing for future moves of God. Every prophetic season builds upon previous ones, and recognizing the transitions requires wisdom regarding both present limitations and future possibilities.

As we witness current prophetic expressions, whether they involve tearing down corrupt systems or building new structures, we must ask: What is God preparing next? Who is He raising up for the subsequent phase? How can current ministries prepare the way for what’s coming?

This forward-thinking approach prevents us from becoming so attached to current anointings that we miss God’s next move or resist necessary transitions in leadership and focus.

The prophetic ministry, in all its dimensions and limitations, serves one ultimate purpose: advancing God’s redemptive agenda until His kingdom is fully established. Understanding these dimensions helps us participate more effectively in that glorious purpose.

The Jehu Anointing: When Destroyers Aren’t Builders

Jehu’s story reveals a crucial limitation that holds profound lessons for contemporary ministry and Saints today we need to truly understand in order for us to function according to heaven’s designed wisdom. While he was anointed to tear down corrupt systems, he lacked the constructive anointing needed to properly rebuild what he had destroyed.

This limitation is manifested in several ways, and it is important we study and correctly understand it, especially in this period. Although Jehu destroyed Baal worship, he maintained the golden calf worship at Dan and Bethel, demonstrating an incomplete understanding of true spiritual reformation. He eliminated political corruption but failed to establish righteous governance systems. Most significantly, he made no effort to restore proper temple worship or rebuild the spiritual infrastructure necessary for Israel’s long-term health.

The scripture’s assessment is telling: “However, as for the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which he made Israel sin, from these Jehu did not depart” (2 Kings 10:31). Jehu could destroy false worship but couldn’t establish true worship.

This limitation in Jehu’s anointing illuminates a crucial principle about prophetic ministry. True prophetic function, as described in Jeremiah 1:10, involves six distinct operations: “to root out and to pull down, to destroy and to throw down, to build and to plant.” The first four functions represent the destructive dimension of prophetic ministry.

The final two—building and planting represent the constructive dimension. Complete prophetic reformation requires both aspects working in harmony. Jehu possessed powerful anointing for the first four functions but lacked capacity for the final two. This wasn’t a character flaw or spiritual failure, it was the specific limitation of his assigned grace.

Understanding the Jehu anointing is crucial for our current season because we may be witnessing similar dynamics in contemporary leadership, both spiritual and political. Leaders who are powerfully anointed to expose corruption, tear down ungodly systems, and confront evil may not possess the constructive anointing needed to build lasting, righteous alternatives.

This recognition should produce several responses in discerning believers. First, we should celebrate the destructive work when it aligns with God’s purposes, recognizing it as necessary preparation for future building. Second, we should avoid expecting comprehensive solutions from leaders whose anointing is primarily destructive. Third, we should begin praying for and identifying the builders who will be needed for the next phase of God’s purposes.

The Danger of Overextension of the Mandate

When individuals with destructive anointing attempt to build beyond their grace, the results are often problematic. Jehu’s attempts at positive governance were marked by the same compromises and incomplete solutions that plagued his predecessors. His zeal for destruction didn’t translate into wisdom for construction.

This pattern appears throughout history when leaders attempt to function beyond their anointing. Military generals may struggle as peacetime administrators. Reformers may lack the skills needed for stable governance. Prophets called to confront may not possess the pastoral anointing needed to heal and restore.

The solution isn’t criticism of these limitations but recognition and preparation for the next phase of God’s work. Jehu’s story reveals that individuals with destructive anointing can maximize their effectiveness through strategic collaboration. Rather than attempting to build beyond their grace, they can invite complementary anointings into partnership.

This requires significant humility and wisdom. It means acknowledging limitations, recognizing when to step back, and facilitating transitions to more appropriate leadership for different seasons. It also requires the broader community to support these transitions rather than demanding that current leader’s function beyond their calling.

Preparing for the Builders

If we are indeed in a “Jehu season” characterized by the tearing down of corrupt systems, we must simultaneously prepare for the building phase that must follow. This preparation involves identifying and developing leaders with apostolic and teaching anointings, pastoral hearts, and administrative excellence.

The builders who follow the destroyers will need different skills: wisdom over zeal, patience over urgency, collaboration over confrontation, and the ability to establish lasting systems rather than simply eliminating problematic ones. Ultimately, both destructive and constructive anointings serve God’s redemptive purposes. The Jehu anointing, despite its limitations, was essential for preparing the ground where future builders could work. Destruction of corrupt systems creates space for righteous alternatives to take root and flourish.

Understanding this divine rhythm helps us appreciate each phase without demanding that any single leader accomplish everything. It also helps us prepare for transitions and collaborate more effectively across different types of anointing. The key is acknowledging that God’s purposes are larger than any individual anointing and that His redemptive agenda unfolds through multiple phases, each requiring different graces and capacities. In celebrating the Jehu anointing where we see it, let us also prepare our hearts and communities for the builders who must follow, ensuring that God’s complete purposes are fulfilled in their proper season and through their appropriate vessels.

The Body of Christ in America, especially within the evangelical, charismatic, and denominational expressions must awaken to a deeper and more accurate understanding of God’s prophetic agenda in this defining season. The question is not merely who is leading, but who will finish well in God’s divine timeline. This is not a time for shallow celebration or reactive alignment, but for spiritual clarity.

The [American] Church needs to reposition her perspective

Many have viewed Donald Trump as a Jehu-type figure—an instrument raised by God to confront entrenched wickedness, challenge the high places, and disrupt ungodly systems. And while there may be elements of divine intent behind such leadership, the Church must not stop at symbolic parallels or populist narratives. We are not called to merely endorse personalities but to rightly divide truth and walk in prophetic sobriety. Celebrating what seems like victory without understanding the full counsel of God is a setup for spiritual drift.

This is where the Church must return to a robust framework of biblical discernment—one rooted in the fear of the Lord, the testimony of Jesus, and the operation of the Holy Spirit. Discernment is not suspicion. It is the spiritual intelligence that enables us to see beyond appearances, weigh spirits, test fruits, and distinguish divine movements from human impulses or demonic counterfeits.

Recover the Mind of Christ: Discernment begins with renewing the mind (Romans 12:2). Our perspective must be shaped by the Word, not by party lines, media narratives, or emotional reactions. A prophetic people must think like Christ, not just vote like conservatives.

Discern the Spirit Behind the Leader: We are not merely evaluating personality traits or policy wins. We must discern the spiritual currents operating behind leaders, what they empower, normalize, and release into culture. Jehu accomplished God’s judgment, but he never fully returned the people to covenant faithfulness. That’s a warning, not just a model. Guard Against Idolatry of Influence: Political influence is not equivalent to Kingdom advancement. When the Church becomes intoxicated with access to power, it risks compromising its prophetic voice. We are salt and light, not campaign managers for any candidate.

Stay Anchored in the Prophetic Word and Season: The sons of Issachar had understanding of the times and knew what Israel ought to do (1 Chronicles 12:32). That’s our call. We must live not by trends or emotional fervor but by revelation—rooted in intimacy with God and alignment with His purposes.

Call the Church Back to the Altar, Not Just the Ballot: America will not be transformed from the top down but from the inside out. Revival begins at the altar, not in the Oval Office. The Church must prioritize repentance, righteousness, and a return to first love if it is to be a true voice in this hour.

If we fail to cultivate spiritual discernment, we will mistake momentary disruptions for lasting deliverance and follow leaders more than we follow the Lamb. The Church is not called to be blind cheerleaders of any man, but prophetic witnesses to Christ in the midst of a shaking nation.